Family banking · BAU vs D10X · Demand validation

When BAU lost the demand test.

A Citi Ventures D10X engagement that ran two product hypotheses head-to-head on the same audience and channel mix. The D10X reframe outperformed the BAU offer. The political case for change was inarguable.

Project at a glance.

Sub-projectWorkplace Banking
Client teamCiti D10X + Citi BAU Workplace Banking team
TimelineApril to September 2020
ChannelsFacebook / Instagram, LinkedIn, Google Search
OutcomePivoted from BAU offer to "Banking for Working Families" on demand-test signal

Challenge.

Citi had an existing employer-channel banking benefits offer (BAU) targeting workplaces and their employees. D10X had a different read on the audience: that family and parenting overlays would outperform career-maturity framing for the same employee pool. The decision Citi brought us was which framing to take forward. The political dynamic added complexity. The BAU stakeholder team had built the existing offer and held a roadmap commitment to it. The D10X team had a reframe hypothesis and wanted to test it cleanly.

Approach.

Outcome.

Methodology lessons.

Have a similar question to put in front of customers?

Tell us what you are deciding and we will tell you what the cadence should look like.

Book a call